Pro Se Plaintiff Challenges PayPal and DOJ in Landmark Federal Cases Over J6 Collusion and Civil Rights Violations.
Jennifer L. Ryan, a pro se litigant, is fighting two groundbreaking federal lawsuits in the Northern District of Texas that could set historic precedents for individual Americans challenging Big Tech and federal overreach. In Ryan v. PayPal, Inc. (Case No. 3:25-cv-01223), Ryan alleges that PayPal wrongfully terminated her account on January 21, 2021, hours after a $200 political tweet tied to January 6 (J6), based on newly uncovered 2024–2025 evidence of PayPal’s coordination with the FBI and FinCEN.
To Help Jenna In Her Fight Click Here
Her parallel case, Ryan v. DOJ & Rochlin (Case No. 3:25-CV-00325-X-BT), accuses the Department of Justice and FBI of malicious prosecution, evidence fabrication, and defamation, falsely labeling her an “extremist” to push a J6 narrative. Ryan’s PayPal case, filed May 14, 2025, asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and § 1985, alleging constitutional violations due to PayPal’s role as a state actor in a federal conspiracy.
Supported by evidence like Executive Order 14147 and Congressional reports, Ryan argues PayPal’s actions caused her 60 days’ incarceration, loss of banking access, and over $100,000 in damages. She opposes PayPal’s motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 13), citing their refusal to pay arbitration fees, a 25-month litigation delay, and merits-based motions as a waiver of arbitration rights (Morgan v. Sundance, Inc., 596 U.S. 411 (2022)).
Ryan seeks judicial review to ensure public accountability, especially amid growing distrust in federal agencies following the DOJ/FBI’s controversial handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case. In her DOJ case, Ryan alleges the FBI fabricated evidence to defame her, mirroring public concerns about institutional transparency seen in Epstein-related backlash.
As a pro se litigant, Ryan has faced significant financial hardship, incurring $20,000 in losses while fighting both cases. A victory against PayPal, a $27 billion fintech giant, would be a historic milestone for pro se plaintiffs, exposing potential federal-private collusion and amplifying calls for accountability post-J6.
“I’m fighting for every American silenced by Big Tech and federal overreach,” Ryan said. “These cases could reveal how far the government and corporations went to target J6 participants. A win would be historic, proving one person can hold powerful institutions accountable.”
Ryan requests limited discovery into PayPal’s FBI/FinCEN communications and urges the court to deny arbitration, citing public interest in constitutional claims (EEOC v. Waffle House, Inc., 534 U.S. 279 (2002)). With both cases before Magistrate Judge Rebecca Rutherford, Ryan’s fight could reshape how courts view pro se litigants and federal-private partnerships.
Court filings are available via CM/ECF for Case Nos. 3:25-cv-01223 and 3:25-CV-00325-X-BT.
Donate to Jenna’s Legal Fund to help fight for civil rights for all Americans and January 6th political prisoners: GiveSendGo – Jenna4Justice https://www.givesendgo.com/jenna4justice
Jenna’s Substack: https://realjennaryan.substack.com
Media Contact: For interviews or more information, contact Jennifer L. Ryan at jennaryanrealty@gmail.com.
The post J6 Political Prisoner, Jenna Ryan Is Successfully Representing Herself in Two $25 Million Civil Rights Lawsuits Against PayPal and the DOJ appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
