The Appellate Brief for Tina Peters has been filed.
On Saturday, the Appellate Brief for Tina Peters was filed.
Treniss Evans shared the news on social media.
Evans thanked the great Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for their incredible generosity and tireless dedication.
He also thanks the following for their work in putting it together – Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good.
BREAKING!!! Tina Peters Appellate Brief Filed!
Thank you, Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good. The team at AMERICAN RIGHTS ALLIANCE delivered, and special thanks to the great Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for their incredible generosity and tireless dedication!
This is gold, and we hope to see immediate action on the status for Tina Peters. I am honored to work with so many amazing and talented people!
BREAKING!!! Tina Peters Appellate Brief Filed!
Thank you, Peter Ticktin, John Case, Stefanie Lambert, Jon Moseley, Pat McSweeney, Bob Cynkar, and Linda Good. The team at AMERICAN RIGHTS ALLIANCE delivered, and special thanks to the great Patrick Byrne and Juan O’Savin for their…— Treniss J. Evans III (@CondemnedUSA) May 31, 2025
Here are the issues on appeal addressed in the document:
ISSUES ON APPEAL
1. Whether the district court erred as a matter of law in denying Ms. Peters’ motion to dismiss based on her claim of immunity pursuant to the Supremacy Clause and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
2. Whether the evidence was insufficient.
3. Whether the court denied Ms. Peters due process.
a. Whether the district court deprived Ms. Peters of a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense.
b. Whether the court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on the statutory defense of execution of a public duty, and the federal constitutional defense of Supremacy Clause immunity.
c. Whether Ms. Peters had adequate notice of the charges.
d. Whether the prosecution misled the jury by stating repeatedly that Ms. Peters’ conduct caused a “security breach.”
e. Whether the court erred by refusing to hold a hearing to investigate allegations of improper juror conduct.
f. Whether the prosecutor’s false statement in rebuttal closing requires a new trial.4. Whether the district court’s sentence violated the First, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and whether the sentence was based in part on a contempt conviction that was later vacated by the Court of Appeals.
See the Brief below:
Tina Peters FINAL Appellate Brief by Joe Ho on Scribd
The post BREAKING: The Appellate Brief for Tina Peters Has Been Filed – See It Here first appeared on Joe Hoft.
The post BREAKING: The Appellate Brief for Tina Peters Has Been Filed – See It Here appeared first on The Gateway Pundit.
